Semantically Handling Disambiguation without Icebergs
Oleg Shilovitsky of Inforbix recently described how Inforbix addresses disambiguation without so-called icebergs of information. Shilovitsky begins by quoting another article out of TopQuadrant: “Increasing regulatory and competitive demands on the business are forcing decision making to be more timely, and to be more integrated across the traditional business boundaries. However these icebergs are getting in the way of effective decision making. One way to make any or all of this information available to consumers is to create the bigger iceberg. ‘Simply’ create the relational database schema that covers every past, current, and future business need, and build adapters to populate this database from the operational data stores. Unfortunately this mega-store can only get more complex as it has to keep up with an expanding scope of information required to support the decision making processes.” Read more

Bob DuCharme,
While sentiment analysis continues to generate a lot of press, it is not clear how much real value organizations are deriving from it. One reason for that is that the standard approach to sentiment has been mostly statistical and/or long lists of sentiment terms. However, if you add in other, advanced text analytics capabilities such as auto-categorization using advanced operators, you can not only develop more sophisticated sentiment analysis, you can also develop a whole new class of applications that either enhance and/or go beyond simple sentiment analysis.
Mike Bergman recently gave a talk
The Economist has published an article,
Mastufa Ahmed recently interviewed Luc Barthelet
James Stevenson has shared his insights
Luca Scagliarini recently shared his insight
Ivan Herman recently offered some insight into 
Eric Franzon
VP Community
Jennifer Zaino
Contributor
Angela Guess Contributor
semanticweb.com Twitter feed loading...